I  have long said that shoppers pick the "yay big" size and that is exemplified 
by the tendency of producers to use packaging that is larger than needed. The 
mass and volume indications are ignored.Jim
-------- Original message --------From: Al Lawrence <[email protected]> 
Date: 3/22/20  00:32  (GMT-06:00) To: "Kaimbridge M. GoldChild" 
<[email protected]>, US Metric Assn ML <[email protected]> Subject: 
[USMA 1318] Re: It took me a while to figure this out. 

Most people hate math and will avoid it at all costs.  Most people don't even 
bother trying to figure out if buying two quarts of ice cream is cheaper than 
buying a half gallon, and many couldn't do it if they tried.  They buy by 
visual size and assume the
 bigger size is cheaper per unit.  They buy two liter bottles of soda, half 
liter bottles of water and other metric packaging without hesitation, simply by 
visually looking at the size without even looking at the net contents.  ANY and 
ALL conversion tables
 (that look like math) or any other attempts to educate them, will turn people 
off and are counterproductive.






Al Lawrence 
 
 







From: USMA <[email protected]> on behalf of Kaimbridge M. 
GoldChild <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, March 21, 2020 11:15 AM
To: US Metric Assn ML <[email protected]>
Subject: [USMA 1317] Re: It took me a while to figure this out.
 


Mark Henschel wrote,

 > But three quarts?
 > If people accept 2.8 liters, and not the typical one, two
 > or four quart sizes, one would hope they would also accept
 > a three liters size.

I think part of the problem in the US of metrication is
conversional magnitude.
A major transitionary step to metric acceptance would be to
require legacy units and conversions to be “magnitude
compatible”—e.g., convert and express liters strictly as
quarts, not gallons, and meters as yards, not feet.
Likewise, the metric prefixes should be as magnitude
compatible as possible, too:

    oz.⬌dag;  floz.⬌cL;  ft⬌dm;  yd⬌m;  in.Hg⬌cmHg⬌kPa;

What is more conversionarily palpable—

    Gas:  “$2.00/gal. ≈ $0.53/L ” or  “$0.50/qt.≈ $0.53/L ”?;
   Food:  “16 Fl oz. (473 mL)”    or  “16 Fl oz. (47.3 cL)”?;
          “8 Oz. (227 g)”         or  “8 Oz. (22.7 dag)“?;
   Bar.:  “1021 hPa“              or  ”102.1 kPa”?;
          “765.3 mmHg”            or  “76.53 cmHg”?;
               (compared to 30.13 in.Hg)
     BP:  “115/73 mmHg”           or  “11.5/7.3 cmHg”?
               (compared to 4.53/2.87 in.)

      ~Kaimbridge~

-- -- --
      Wiki—Sites Contribution History Pages:

        en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Kaimbridge
          math.wikia.com/wiki/Special:Contributions/Kaimbridge
  wiki.gis.com/wiki/index.php/Special:Contributions/Kaimbridge
         rosettacode.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Kaimbridge

      *****  Void Where Permitted; Limit 0 Per Customer.  *****

_______________________________________________
USMA mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.colostate.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/usma





_______________________________________________
USMA mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.colostate.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/usma

Reply via email to