The weights are mainly in kg.  Not sure why that has relevance to personal 
weight.

I use stones because I dont know of anyone who doesn’t  - check the slimming 
schemes, adverts, programmes etc



> On 23 May 2020, at 9:50 pm, Martin Vlietstra <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> When I used a gym, the various weights that one could pick up were all 
> measured in kilograms. Is your gym the same? If so, why do you use stones for 
> personal weight?
>  
> When my son, who is an army officer, does any training, his criteria (taken 
> from army textbooks) is to calculate the weight carried in a backpack as a 
> percentage of your own body weight. When he was training from home, he used 
> two litre bottles of water as ballast – two litres of water is two kilograms 
> (plus the weight of the plastic). I have no idea how many stones such a 
> bottle is.   
>  
> From: Stephen Humphreys [mailto:[email protected]] 
> Sent: 23 May 2020 21:36
> To: Martin Vlietstra
> Cc: Paul Trusten; Metric List Postings
> Subject: Re: [USMA 1415] Re: Ancestry survey
>  
> TBF I can’t remember the last time I checked my BMI - Being a regular gym 
> goer I’m hoping to gain ’the right weight’ which skews the BMI stuff
> 
> 
> On 23 May 2020, at 9:29 pm, Martin Vlietstra <[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>  
> … but it is still a pain working out your BMI using imperial units unless you 
> have an ap. It is a bit simpler using customary units (pounds only, not 
> stones and pounds) and simplest of all using metric units.  Compare trying to 
> work out the BMI of somebody who is 17.5 stone, height 5’9” rather than 
> somebody who weighs 110 kg and is 175 cm tall. Both should give the same 
> answer of 36 km/m^2 (though the units are usually omitted)..
>  
> From: Stephen Humphreys [mailto:[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>] 
> Sent: 23 May 2020 18:42
> To: Martin Vlietstra
> Cc: Paul Trusten; Metric List Postings
> Subject: Re: [USMA 1415] Re: Ancestry survey
>  
> For purposes of the conversation I just said ‘a little over a stone’ in 
> answer to his question.  It was only a brief interlude before the proper 
> business stuff.
>  
> My main point was that thanks to a pandemic virus, people are getting 
> healthier.  Strange times.
>  
> 
> 
> 
> On 23 May 2020, at 3:12 pm, Martin Vlietstra <[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>  
> So how would you normally have spoken of 16 pounds – “One stone, two” or “One 
> and an eighth stone” or “A little over a stone”?
>  
> From: Stephen Humphreys [mailto:[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>] 
> Sent: 22 May 2020 21:39
> To: Martin Vlietstra
> Cc: Paul Trusten; Metric List Postings
> Subject: Re: [USMA 1415] Re: Ancestry survey
>  
> It’s not older members of the public Martin.
>  
> Also  at private hospitals and NHS ones I’ve always noticed guides on walls 
> behind weighing scales.
>  
> Re ‘Older’ - In a zoom meeting at work we discussed health regarding this 
> virus.
> The audience was Brits and Americans
> I mentioned that I had lost 16 lbs since the lockdown (due to 3 hours 
> exercise per day).   I used pounds due to the type of audience.
>  
> The youngest person (late 20’s) made a comment you might find funny. 
> He said - Whats 16 pounds? I dont use the new stuff I still use stones. I had 
> to say ‘just over a stone’    :-)
>  
>  
>  
>  
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On 22 May 2020, at 6:14 pm, Martin Vlietstra <[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>  
> A number of years ago I read of a death in the United Kingdom that resulted 
> from misuse of imperial units. Unfortunately I no longer have the details, 
> but as far as I can remember, the baby concerned had an underlying condition. 
> Two different midwives checked and weighed the baby at the post-natal clinic 
> – one used metric units and the other insisted on using imperial units. The 
> result was that no-one noticed that the baby was not putting on weight. The 
> resultant death went to the coroners court and the midwife who insisted on 
> using “proper” units was criticised by the coroner, as was the health 
> authority concerned for allowing “dual” units to be used.
>  
> Any switch to metric units HAS to be authorised from the top (or at any rate 
> the organisation that looks after the database concerned).  The norm in the 
> United Kingdom is that data entry is in metric units, but most health workers 
> have a conversion chart readily to hands to “translate” for the “older” 
> members of the population. 
>  
> From: USMA [mailto:[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>] On Behalf Of Paul Trusten
> Sent: 22 May 2020 17:05
> To: Metric List Postings
> Subject: [USMA 1412] Re: Ancestry survey
>  
> Dear ListServer Folks,
>  
> As a hospital pharmacist, I regret to say that, generally, true U.S. 
> metrication of this patient data (patient height and body mass)may not yet be 
> complete. Because American society AND American healthcare workers continue 
> to use feet/inches and pounds on an everyday, colloquial basis, those legacy 
> units persist strongly in the culture, and in most U.S. healthcare cultures, 
> the legacy units continue to be the spoken units of measurement, I.e., when 
> asked for height and weight, patients quote them in feet and pounds, and the 
> nurse or doctor initially records them as such. 
>  
> Once entered into the electronic health information system, however, they are 
> substituted with metric measurements, and posted in kilograms and centimeters 
> only. But they have not yet been exorcized from our  midst. SI units are 
> simply not yet “in the entire lingo“ of American healthcare. 
>  
> In the absence of early metric education, pounds and feet are frames of 
> reference that we Americans are unwilling to abandon without good reason, and 
> I fear that good reason will come in the form of a medical Mars Orbiter or 
> Gimli Glider. 
> 
> Paul Trusten
> Midland, Texas
> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>  
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On May 22, 2020, at 10:28, Michael Payne <[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> 
>> I believe all US hospitals also use kilogram body mass and centimetres as 
>> well as celsius. 
>>  
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On 20 May 2020, at 22:24, Martin Vlietstra <[email protected] 
>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>  
>> In the UK hospitals use metric units for height and weight measurements 
>> while in Australia everybody uses kilograms. Since Ancestry.com 
>> <https://nam01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fancestry.com%2F&amp;data=02%7C01%7Cusma%40lists.colostate.edu%7C2030f83e4f7441f1a51e08d7ff6280c8%7Cafb58802ff7a4bb1ab21367ff2ecfc8b%7C0%7C0%7C637258670852040809&amp;sdata=IcrOjtbwaREnfM55qPEgYmHfqta4iOOIDjw7XPxuJ0w%3D&amp;reserved=0>
>>  is a world-wide organisation, it makes sense to give users the option of 
>> either units.  
>>  
>> From: USMA [mailto:[email protected] 
>> <mailto:[email protected]>] On Behalf Of Michael Payne
>> Sent: 20 May 2020 06:29
>> To: USMA List Server
>> Subject: [USMA 1410] Ancestry survey
>>  
>> I recently received a survey from Ancestry.com 
>> <https://nam01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fancestry.com%2F&amp;data=02%7C01%7Cusma%40lists.colostate.edu%7C2030f83e4f7441f1a51e08d7ff6280c8%7Cafb58802ff7a4bb1ab21367ff2ecfc8b%7C0%7C0%7C637258670852040809&amp;sdata=IcrOjtbwaREnfM55qPEgYmHfqta4iOOIDjw7XPxuJ0w%3D&amp;reserved=0>
>>  regarding a genetic survey on Covid19, they want to see if anyone who’s had 
>> a DNA test with Ancestry has had or been exposed to Covid 19. One of the 
>> interesting aspects were when it got near the end of the survey they asked 
>> for your height and weight, apart from “American Standard” as they termed it 
>> you could choose metric which gave you the option of cm and kg for height 
>> and weight.
>>  
>> Mike Payne
>>  
>> _______________________________________________
>> USMA mailing list
>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>> https://lists.colostate.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/usma 
>> <https://nam01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.colostate.edu%2Fcgi-bin%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fusma&amp;data=02%7C01%7Cusma%40lists.colostate.edu%7C2030f83e4f7441f1a51e08d7ff6280c8%7Cafb58802ff7a4bb1ab21367ff2ecfc8b%7C0%7C0%7C637258670852040809&amp;sdata=EYDjL8ijTtDH6TXw4yqYjQIDNDdIZp3a2jZL3SF%2FZMc%3D&amp;reserved=0>
> _______________________________________________
> USMA mailing list
> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
> https://nam01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.colostate.edu%2Fcgi-bin%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fusma&amp;data=02%7C01%7Cusma%40lists.colostate.edu%7C2030f83e4f7441f1a51e08d7ff6280c8%7Cafb58802ff7a4bb1ab21367ff2ecfc8b%7C0%7C0%7C637258670852040809&amp;sdata=EYDjL8ijTtDH6TXw4yqYjQIDNDdIZp3a2jZL3SF%2FZMc%3D&amp;reserved=0
>  
> <https://nam01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.colostate.edu%2Fcgi-bin%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fusma&amp;data=02%7C01%7Cusma%40lists.colostate.edu%7C2030f83e4f7441f1a51e08d7ff6280c8%7Cafb58802ff7a4bb1ab21367ff2ecfc8b%7C0%7C0%7C637258670852040809&amp;sdata=EYDjL8ijTtDH6TXw4yqYjQIDNDdIZp3a2jZL3SF%2FZMc%3D&amp;reserved=0>
_______________________________________________
USMA mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.colostate.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/usma

Reply via email to