It is good to teach students the Agrarian nature of the Imperial system and
why this is not good.  Give them barley corns, and when they object, you
point to Heyman’s book from Oxford? Dated 1998 that includes bc’s.





I have seen a shaped charge destroy concrete, the size of a grenade, shaped
and drives a scrap of copper at 28000 m/s into the concrete after
accelerating about 25 mm.



I think I have the math right as it was mentioned about a decade ago , the
concrete blowing apart is very pretty



A bc is 1/3rd of an inch



You cannot do COVID virus analysis without logs



*From:* Martin Vlietstra <[email protected]>
*Sent:* Friday, 10 July 2020 3:46 PM
*To:* 'John Nichols' <[email protected]>; 'Stanislav Jakuba' <
[email protected]>; 'John Altounji' <[email protected]>
*Cc:* 'U.S. Metric Association' <[email protected]>;
[email protected]
*Subject:* RE: [USMA 1488] Re: Moon flight



The “bomb expert” to whom you are referring was William Penney, later Lord
Penney. He was a scientist rather than an engineer who did his PhD in
crystallography. From my own experience as an undergraduate at the
University of Natal in the 1960’s (before South Africa adopted the metric
system), science used the cgs system (though the physics department was
moving over to the mks system), while engineering used the fps system.



Given that most theoretical work was done in a scientific rather than an
engineering sense, my guess is that he used cgs units. For the record,
there is a long tradition in the UK of using metric units for the
theoretical work and then converting to imperial units for general
consumption – this is widely practiced in the UK health system – all
patient weights and heights are recorded in metric units, but the nurse
concerned as a look-up chart and converts to imperial units for the
patient’s “benefit”. This concept is not new – in 1620, the polymath Edmund
Gunter, having developed a forerunner of the slide rule to aid him with the
new-fangled branches of mathematics called logarithms and trigonometry
devised “Gunter’s chain” which had 100 links. The chain itself was one
tenth of a furlong and a square chain was one tenth of an acre. He could
use this chain along with trigonometry (and logarithms or his forerunner of
the slide rule) to calculate the area of an odd-shaped field. His final
answer would be in square chains, but he then had the additional final
exercise of converting that into acres,  roods and perches (40 perches in
one rood and 4 roods in one acre).



*From:* USMA [mailto:[email protected]
<[email protected]>] *On Behalf Of *John Nichols
*Sent:* 10 July 2020 15:35
*To:* Stanislav Jakuba; John Altounji
*Cc:* U.S. Metric Association; [email protected]
*Subject:* [USMA 1488] Re: Moon flight



Although this is completely unrelated:



   1. What units system did they use for the Los Alamos project
   2. Without the bomb expert from England who had sorted out the math for
   shaped charges for the SOS the bomb would not have worked
   3. Roosevelt had to ask Churchill for the guy because he was so valuable
   to England



Is my understanding



*John Nichols*
Construction Science, College of Architecture | Texas A&M University
ph: 979.845.6541  | [email protected]
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
*https://nam01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.tamu.edu%2F&amp;data=02%7C01%7CusMA%40lists.colostate.edu%7Cd3616be4cece4f0d241b08d82514c44d%7Cafb58802ff7a4bb1ab21367ff2ecfc8b%7C0%7C0%7C637300118411558518&amp;sdata=yTmKnvF4oT1cWuwv%2B1IR9Dv1wsStHy3qPPIfR5HjJGk%3D&amp;reserved=0*
<https://nam01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Furldefense.com%2Fv3%2F__https%3A%2Fnam01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com%2F%3Furl%3Dhttp*3A*2F*2Fwww.tamu.edu*2F%26data%3D02*7C01*7CusMA*40lists.colostate.edu*7C802c293045454644ccc908d824de6c09*7Cafb58802ff7a4bb1ab21367ff2ecfc8b*7C0*7C0*7C637299884999758034%26sdata%3DqdQ6L2fFjwXHrbUI*2FZwvkGX0oaLv2xeBPn1L4lxOKcM*3D%26reserved%3D0__%3BJSUlJSUlJSUlJSUlJSU!!KwNVnqRv!RqEge1pGJaLOHT8Z6fa7RyjC-QxR8THTdrP3oWS75BC5IiviagR3hcuTa2yeBBCpt24%24&amp;data=02%7C01%7CusMA%40lists.colostate.edu%7Cd3616be4cece4f0d241b08d82514c44d%7Cafb58802ff7a4bb1ab21367ff2ecfc8b%7C0%7C0%7C637300118411558518&amp;sdata=rASkxGn7DEU4z3Z4fnfe1Y22UnQRGaM43XqNLbwGCsc%3D&amp;reserved=0>



*From:* USMA <[email protected]> *On Behalf Of *Stanislav
Jakuba
*Sent:* Friday, 10 July 2020 8:41 AM
*To:* John Altounji <[email protected]>
*Cc:* U.S. Metric Association <[email protected]>; [email protected]
*Subject:* [USMA 1487] Re: Moon flight



Thanks for the feedback!



On Thu, Jul 9, 2020 at 3:40 PM John Altounji <[email protected]> wrote:

I liked both your emails.  You should combine them and publish them to
counter the bad social media.



Way to go Stan,



John Altounji
One size does not fit all.
Social promotion ruined Education.

Education is values first, then knowledge.

https://nam01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fjohnaltounji.weebly.com%2F&amp;data=02%7C01%7CusMA%40lists.colostate.edu%7Cd3616be4cece4f0d241b08d82514c44d%7Cafb58802ff7a4bb1ab21367ff2ecfc8b%7C0%7C0%7C637300118411558518&amp;sdata=xyz%2F8q3inmR%2BzELducldbVT7x55jiDDhGG%2BWjJ9Q8yo%3D&amp;reserved=0
<https://nam01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Furldefense.com%2Fv3%2F__https%3A%2Fnam01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com%2F%3Furl%3Dhttps*3A*2F*2Furldefense.com*2Fv3*2F__https*3A*2Fnam01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com*2F*3Furl*3Dhttps*3A*2F*2Fjohnaltounji.weebly.com*2F*26data*3D02*7C01*7CusMA*40lists.colostate.edu*7Cade5e98a022e40e795cd08d824d6d69b*7Cafb58802ff7a4bb1ab21367ff2ecfc8b*7C0*7C0*7C637299852428202356*26sdata*3D*2BjSij7hmQ8gUx8iOZudI8z8pZGvV*2F2WfsPGafEGb0Dc*3D*26reserved*3D0__*3BJSUlJSUlJSUlJSUlJSUl!!KwNVnqRv!WFYLpKlJNVQUEARLgYCe1Es2DmqqL0yKJDNSzM-Mww1p_fYGQ_u4lkWXuXfxllh0bRs*24%26data%3D02*7C01*7CusMA*40lists.colostate.edu*7C802c293045454644ccc908d824de6c09*7Cafb58802ff7a4bb1ab21367ff2ecfc8b*7C0*7C0*7C637299884999768032%26sdata%3Dz2v9hFEPfNKd1J200CDWSqM3yg3C*2BKYntYzp*2FaTxXbY*3D%26reserved%3D0__%3BJSUlJSUlJSUlJSoqKiolJSoqKioqKioqJSUqKiolJSUlJSUlJSUlJSUlJSU!!KwNVnqRv!RqEge1pGJaLOHT8Z6fa7RyjC-QxR8THTdrP3oWS75BC5IiviagR3hcuTa2yeOeZtsfA%24&amp;data=02%7C01%7CusMA%40lists.colostate.edu%7Cd3616be4cece4f0d241b08d82514c44d%7Cafb58802ff7a4bb1ab21367ff2ecfc8b%7C0%7C0%7C637300118411558518&amp;sdata=bxC59GtuQNvi1BAiRD0v8zVPEI%2BxF0k5RztTzteAXKA%3D&amp;reserved=0>



*From:* USMA <[email protected]> *On Behalf Of *Stanislav
Jakuba
*Sent:* Thursday, July 9, 2020 6:40 AM
*To:* U.S. Metric Association <[email protected]>; [email protected]
*Subject:* [USMA 1479] Moon flight



One more comment to the "We flew to the Moon with inches" argument:



Without trying to diminish the Moon Flight achievement, we would not have
gotten off the ground without the metric designed and built-in-Russia first
stage on the rocket.



It was not because "made-in-Russia" made it cheaper; it was because just
one scientific genius there, the only person in the world, figured out the
technology needed to control the burning rate on that huge scale. So it is
still today, although I do not know about the Chinese.



NASA already was on the way to metrication judging from how many metric
training seminars I presented at various centers from JPL to Huntsvile AL
at that time. Why the US did not complete the "phasin-in-metric" is still
debated. I blame mostly schools, where the teachers, on all levels,
taught conversions instead of the "system." Trying to sell my
training seminars to teachers organizations - "oh we know all about the
metric units. Get lost."

Stan J.
_______________________________________________
USMA mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.colostate.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/usma

Reply via email to