"Chun Tian (binghe)" <binghe.l...@gmail.com> writes: > Hi, Stas Boukarev > > You're right. We should always use "ns-try-again-condition" instead of > "ns-try-again" as most backends does. > > Fixed in trunk and earlier branches. > > P.S. Do you know how to reliably trigger this condition? I want to added > "ns-try-again-condition" into our always-broken unit test code, so that all > supported platforms could have this condition reported correctly. It happened to me when my connection died. I can't think of any software method, aside from writing your own nameserver.
-- With Best Regards, Stas. _______________________________________________ usocket-devel mailing list usocket-devel@common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/usocket-devel
