Thanks all the same. On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 5:27 PM, Stas Boukarev <stass...@gmail.com> wrote: > "Chun Tian (binghe)" <binghe.l...@gmail.com> writes: > >> Hi, Stas Boukarev >> >> You're right. We should always use "ns-try-again-condition" instead of >> "ns-try-again" as most backends does. >> >> Fixed in trunk and earlier branches. >> >> P.S. Do you know how to reliably trigger this condition? I want to added >> "ns-try-again-condition" into our always-broken unit test code, so that all >> supported platforms could have this condition reported correctly. > It happened to me when my connection died. I can't think of any software > method, aside from writing your own nameserver. > > -- > With Best Regards, Stas. >
-- Chun Tian (binghe) _______________________________________________ usocket-devel mailing list usocket-devel@common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/usocket-devel
