It seems to me, that usocket and IOlib are two projects of mostly the same abstraction level, that implement alternative approaches: Lisp-runtime-backed and OS-backed sockets. And it would be better, if the alternatives both remain.
Best, Vsevolod On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 4:07 PM, Hans Hübner <hans.hueb...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 15:01, Chun Tian <binghe.l...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I'm thinking of writing a IOlib backend for USOCKET. [...] > > > Will this idea be helpful for any USOCKET user? > > It will not be helpful to me at the moment, but I do like the idea - > It would be particularily nice if it would be easily possible to use > USOCKET and still use the I/O multiplexing facility of IOlib (i.e. run > some USOCKET based libraries and add more file descriptors to the I/O > multiplexer without having to resort to threads). > > -Hans > > _______________________________________________ > usocket-devel mailing list > usocket-devel@common-lisp.net > http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/usocket-devel >
_______________________________________________ usocket-devel mailing list usocket-devel@common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/usocket-devel
