Vsevolod Dyomkin <vselo...@gmail.com> writes: > It seems to me, that usocket and IOlib are two projects of mostly the > same abstraction level, that implement alternative approaches: > Lisp-runtime-backed and OS-backed sockets. And it would be better, if > the alternatives both remain.
Indeed. However you should consider the integration of libraries written to use these competing libraries. We had the case with UFFI and CFFI too. There's a UFFI/CFFI compatibility package to allow libraries using the UFFI API to work with CFFI. -- __Pascal Bourguignon__ http://www.informatimago.com/ _______________________________________________ usocket-devel mailing list usocket-devel@common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/usocket-devel
