Wow, I don't know why running it in the GUI would matter. You mentioned you
did some customization in the Vivado GUI. Could that have something to do
with it?

I looked over your YAML and I noticed you have MEM_DATA_W on the Replay
block set to 128 but you're building for the X410_X4_200 target which
expects 64-bit interfaces. I think that would corrupt the data, but not
prevent TX. So I don't know if that entirely explains the issue. But it
does need to be 64 unless you've made changes elsewhere to compensate.

Wade

On Wed, Jun 7, 2023 at 8:30 PM <jmalo...@umass.edu> wrote:

> If I use the same yml file I pasted above, I am able to generate an image
> that properly transmits. However, if I use the same yml file, but when I
> use the rfnoc_image_builder but with a GUI option, the transmit fails to
> work. I do not edit anything in the GUI, I just tested the bitstream
> created as is after invoking rfnoc_image_builder with the GUI option. I
> would imagine that GUI option or not, the constraints have to be identical.
> Is there any chance they are not?
> _______________________________________________
> USRP-users mailing list -- usrp-users@lists.ettus.com
> To unsubscribe send an email to usrp-users-le...@lists.ettus.com
>
_______________________________________________
USRP-users mailing list -- usrp-users@lists.ettus.com
To unsubscribe send an email to usrp-users-le...@lists.ettus.com

Reply via email to