On 23/04/2014 02:29, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
Any thoughts on this path forward?
I was also under the impression that we want to make quick progress on
main documents and work on harder issues in parallel or even later
revisions of them.
On 3/26/14, 10:26 AM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
On 3/17/14, 7:47 AM, Eliot Lear wrote:
I'd like suggest a change of direction for this discussion.
I would, too. :-)
My recollection from conversations in Vancouver is that we were seeking
a quick win of documenting best practices for the existing use of TLS
and PKI - TLS versions, cipher suites, etc. With all the conversations
over terminology, unauthenticated encryption, DANE as a new mode in
addition to PKI, etc., I wonder if we could at least push forward
quickly with the TLS-PKI recommendations and, in parallel, work out the
thornier issues.
_______________________________________________
Uta mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta
