> 25 apr 2014 kl. 18:27 skrev Alexey Melnikov <[email protected]>: > >> On 23/04/2014 02:29, Peter Saint-Andre wrote: >> Any thoughts on this path forward? > I was also under the impression that we want to make quick progress on main > documents and work on harder issues in parallel or even later revisions of > them.
As always, progress can start with review of the documents we have actually started writing. I haven't seen any review of the three wg docs we have on the books right now (nudge nudge)... > >>> On 3/26/14, 10:26 AM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote: >>>> On 3/17/14, 7:47 AM, Eliot Lear wrote: >>>> I'd like suggest a change of direction for this discussion. >>> >>> I would, too. :-) >>> >>> My recollection from conversations in Vancouver is that we were seeking >>> a quick win of documenting best practices for the existing use of TLS >>> and PKI - TLS versions, cipher suites, etc. With all the conversations >>> over terminology, unauthenticated encryption, DANE as a new mode in >>> addition to PKI, etc., I wonder if we could at least push forward >>> quickly with the TLS-PKI recommendations and, in parallel, work out the >>> thornier issues. > > _______________________________________________ > Uta mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta _______________________________________________ Uta mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta
