-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 2014-07-22 01:20, Aaron Zauner wrote:
> Hi Peter, Leif:
>
> Leif Johansson wrote:
>
>>> With the proviso that substantive issues need to be discussed
>>> in a venue (such as this list) that is explicitly covered by
>>> the IETF Note Well statement. As far as I know, github.com is
>>> not such a venue.
>
> I have no issue providing all text changes to the list for
> discussion. And I will (not yet done). Just asking to update the
> document on github [0], since it has seemed to be used to edit the
> document in the past. Versioning is really helpful to track changes
> in my experience. I hope you agree.
>
> Aaron
>
> [0]- https://github.com/stpeter/uta
>
No I don't actually.
I understand this might be a convenient way to collaborate on a
document but in the IETF we have a consensus process which relies on
open discussion on mailing lists that comes first.
Please provide your suggestions (and those are *very* welcome) on this
list and we'll see what the rest of the WG thinks.
Best R
Leif
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
iEYEARECAAYFAlPNvjIACgkQ8Jx8FtbMZneTMQCfQ4TP8YIZs4hTFJgBvDR6m11s
fcsAoMpTZNw8VPTpReiftHcdgZs0T41O
=/QBL
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Uta mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta
