On 2014-07-23 16:27, Bodo Moeller wrote: > Additional points: > > > - The rationale for the current SSL 3.0 "SHOULD NOT" is that it "did not > support strong cipher suites", just as for TLS 1.0. The document should > be clear that allowing SSL 3.0 is much worse than allowing TLS 1.0, for > a number of reasons including the following:
Joe Hildebrand volunteered to propose text related to this. _______________________________________________ Uta mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta
