Pete, Leif and I talked and we suggest to Last Call it now. Thanks, The chairs.
> -----Original Message----- > From: Uta [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Pete Resnick > Sent: Sunday, September 28, 2014 6:29 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: [Uta] AD Evaluation of draft-ietf-uta-tls-attacks-03 > > Folks, > > I've completed my review of draft-ietf-uta-tls-attacks-03. Fine work; > it's ready to go to Last Call. Just a few nits, which I'm fine leaving > until after Last Call: > > Section 1: s/motivated/was one of the motivations for/ > > Section 2: Somewhere explain what the CVE numbers are. > > Section 2.8: s/to define/the definition of/ > > Section 2.13: s/the integration of/when integrating into/ > > That said, a question, probably mostly for the chairs, but others can of > course speak up if they have something to add: It seems to me that this > document could probably wait until the BCP is also ready for Last Call > because it might be good to review both documents together. Do you > really want me to Last Call it now (and put a stake in the ground that > you've gotten it done), or do you want me to hold off for a bit? I'm > happy to proceed either way. > > pr > > -- > Pete Resnick<http://www.qualcomm.com/~presnick/> > Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. - +1 (858)651-4478 > > _______________________________________________ > Uta mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta _______________________________________________ Uta mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta
