> Orit said > "We have the "Opportunistic TLS" topic as one of the UTA potential > deliverables, so we welcome the interested parties to write a separate > draft on the subject ..... "
On Jan 17, the charter was mapped to a list of proposed deliverable. Please, see the WG archive for the corresponding thread. One of the identified deliverables is: 4. A document discussing (and potentially defining) how to apply the opportunistic encryption approach (preliminary outlined in draft-farrelll-mpls-opportunistic-encrypt-00.txt) to TLS. (Category TBD) > > Well, no. The charter does not mention opportunistic, so again, we lack > a definition, or at least a link between whichever part of the charter > people have in mind and the term "Opportunistic TLS". That's probably a statement for the ADs to address... Pete, could you, please, chime in and clarify (again) what the intention of the Charter language is and how it corresponds to the "Opportunistic ..." concept? >From the UTA Charter: "- Consider, and possibly define, a standard way for an application client and server to use unauthenticated encryption through TLS when server and/or client authentication cannot be achieved." Thanks, Orit. _______________________________________________ Uta mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta
