On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 9:20 AM, Yaron Sheffer <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Watson, > > Please see below. > > Yaron > > On 10/24/2014 06:41 PM, Watson Ladd wrote: >> >> >> Section 2, bullet 3 seems to include STMP. It's unclear if this is in >> fact correct. > > > SMTP is used both for message submission and for server-to-server message > relay. The document applies to the former, but probably not to the latter. > >> >> 2.1. We have "They are not in the scope of this document. We discuss >> them under.." which seems wrong to me. > > > Please explain what you mean here.
For something not in scope, we spend a lot of time talking about them. > >> >> 7.4 doesn't explain what the checks are that are required on points, >> referring instead to an IKE document. > > > As a co-author of both the current document and the cited IKE document, I > believe such checks are way out of scope of a BCP. They are definitely > needed, and there should be a standards track document describing them. You > are welcome (I am not being cynical) to write one. That's going on the maybe pile. But I see your argument, despite many implementations having these checks, and some not. > > >> >> These are very minor complaints. >> > -- "Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary Safety deserve neither Liberty nor Safety." -- Benjamin Franklin _______________________________________________ Uta mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta
