Hi Joe, Sorry, not for not replying in-line to your lenghty text, just wanted to throw this out there:
In a project I participate (bettercrypto.org) we had lenghty discussion for about a year on this topic. In the end we decided on reducing our recommendations to AES128. Basically for the following reasons: .) There are more attacks known on (reduced round!) AES256 .) Vincent Rijmen told us to use AES128 .) Performance :) Aaron
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Uta mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta
