-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On 19/11/14 19:40, Aaron Zauner wrote: >> AES128 should suffice for the >>> timeframe of this WG and the current documents that we should >>> - really - get out of the door soon. +many^many and I also agree with Steve K's opinions here. > Also; isn't this an issue CFRG is tasked to handle instead of WGs > themselves? We might ask for advice if we cannot find consensus. I don't think we ought ask CFRG this question. There's enough folks here who know enough that that's not needed. Wrt post-quantum stuff, that would be a good topic for CFRG and I know there's some interest there too. But there's no need to formally "ask" them about it - just subscribe and send mail to their list. (Not everything has to be formal:-) S. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJUbRqaAAoJEC88hzaAX42ir3YIAL15CqffOFcAz0+WznqlJ1hP uDdqslQu9B7nl/8Exus/ORgQmJ7OPMiE9PhXVAj+oh5EEZB8/fdNeuYErxlMLz8j apv6VErZB1R9qxsZMy6zGqon5Ght3MgegwBMbywKPuXLDFrxvXJx0Q27L0N/aivf E1/ud+IdmwXXhc9VA2U6nw4aRtCaZ0yBJD8sMQVcc5MNBkqKb6FEpDhUCeytXUjF HlNXBbyTsO4sGJrF46Nv89HnG9DfyMWWcuNav9/Go3c54xjCHUDZBrArL3zFZ7s3 ijaOHuuXxtQF9sJb9lNhTETviJVAdVKK/jhTCKLWcUvSM+XrYivUw+/nhtOIICA= =eQoF -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Uta mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta
