On 2/17/15 2:11 PM, Pete Resnick wrote:
On 2/17/15 2:07 PM, Peter Saint-Andre - &yet wrote:
On 2/17/15 12:49 PM, Alissa Cooper wrote:
So my question is whether we should consider this document effectively
silent about the choice of cipher suites to be used when we
standardize a
new application protocol in the IETF, or an update to an existing
protocol.
If an application protocol wishes to follow the recommendations here,
someone needs to write a document that says so.
What about new protocols?
Right, I was thinking of existing protocols. For new protocols, I do
think it makes sense to reference this BCP. Something vaguely along the
lines of what we did in RFC 6648 seems sensible.
That is the impression that I get from the text right now, and
it doesn't quite match the way we've been using/citing the document in
some recent discussions of other drafts.
Do you have examples?
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-paws-protocol-20#section-7
Thanks. That reference seems fine to me.
Peter
--
Peter Saint-Andre
https://andyet.com/
_______________________________________________
Uta mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta
