>> I don't think UTA wants a piece of the action over at CFRG - that group
>> doesn't need another set of "helpful" hands IMHO :-)
> As a CFRG co-chair, I thank you for not trying to be "helpful" :-).
>
You are welcome.
> I think the difference is that UTA picks from documented ciphers, while
> CFRG might recommend new ones. So at least there is some logical
> separation of duties.
>
That is my understanding as chair and that is what the authors are
trying to get across by the paragraph we're talking about.
Cheers Leif
_______________________________________________
Uta mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta
