On 22/03/2015 15:49, Leif Johansson wrote:
On 03/22/2015 04:10 PM, Alexey Melnikov wrote:
On 19/03/2015 11:06, Leif Johansson wrote:
Folks,
We need to get this document out the door! Getting a few reviews would
help a great deal!
In the latest version I split the requirements into different sections
talking about Mail User Agent implementors, Mail Service Providers and
CAs. I found some bugs, so this was a useful exercise.
I also added another example of a single host where multiple services
are running, when all of them are reusing the same server certificate.
Please review and comment, in particular about SHOULDs versa MUSTs. I
can explain my motivation for different choices, but it would be good to
discuss on the mailing list if any choices are not clear.
Sorry - did you cut a 02 yet or did you want addl reviews first? I'm all
for pushing this to WGLC during IETF week if we can rustle up (forgive
the pun) some warm bodies to do review-for-beer :-)
I have a version of -02 that fixes the unterminated sentence provlem
spotted by Victor. But I think the published -01 is ready for WGLC.
_______________________________________________
Uta mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta
