On 03/22/2015 04:54 PM, Alexey Melnikov wrote:
> On 22/03/2015 15:49, Leif Johansson wrote:
>> On 03/22/2015 04:10 PM, Alexey Melnikov wrote:
>>> On 19/03/2015 11:06, Leif Johansson wrote:
>>>> Folks,
>>>>
>>>> We need to get this document out the door! Getting a few reviews would
>>>> help a great deal!
>>> In the latest version I split the requirements into different sections
>>> talking about Mail User Agent implementors, Mail Service Providers and
>>> CAs. I found some bugs, so this was a useful exercise.
>>> I also added another example of a single host where multiple services
>>> are running, when all of them are reusing the same server certificate.
>>>
>>> Please review and comment, in particular about SHOULDs versa MUSTs. I
>>> can explain my motivation for different choices, but it would be good to
>>> discuss on the mailing list if any choices are not clear.
>> Sorry - did you cut a 02 yet or did you want addl reviews first? I'm all
>> for pushing this to WGLC during IETF week if we can rustle up (forgive
>> the pun) some warm bodies to do review-for-beer :-)
> I have a version of -02 that fixes the unterminated sentence provlem
> spotted by Victor. But I think the published -01 is ready for WGLC.
> 

Don't underestimate the value of a ping :-)

_______________________________________________
Uta mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta

Reply via email to