On 03/22/2015 04:54 PM, Alexey Melnikov wrote: > On 22/03/2015 15:49, Leif Johansson wrote: >> On 03/22/2015 04:10 PM, Alexey Melnikov wrote: >>> On 19/03/2015 11:06, Leif Johansson wrote: >>>> Folks, >>>> >>>> We need to get this document out the door! Getting a few reviews would >>>> help a great deal! >>> In the latest version I split the requirements into different sections >>> talking about Mail User Agent implementors, Mail Service Providers and >>> CAs. I found some bugs, so this was a useful exercise. >>> I also added another example of a single host where multiple services >>> are running, when all of them are reusing the same server certificate. >>> >>> Please review and comment, in particular about SHOULDs versa MUSTs. I >>> can explain my motivation for different choices, but it would be good to >>> discuss on the mailing list if any choices are not clear. >> Sorry - did you cut a 02 yet or did you want addl reviews first? I'm all >> for pushing this to WGLC during IETF week if we can rustle up (forgive >> the pun) some warm bodies to do review-for-beer :-) > I have a version of -02 that fixes the unterminated sentence provlem > spotted by Victor. But I think the published -01 is ready for WGLC. >
Don't underestimate the value of a ping :-) _______________________________________________ Uta mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta
