Hi, Peter,

On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 4:09 PM, Peter Saint-Andre - &yet <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Hi Spencer, thanks for the review. Comments inline.
>
>
> On 4/20/15 2:23 PM, Spencer Dawkins wrote:
>
>> Spencer Dawkins has entered the following ballot position for
>> draft-ietf-uta-xmpp-06: Yes
>>
>> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
>> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
>> introductory paragraph, however.)
>>
>>
>> Please refer to http://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
>> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
>>
>>
>> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
>> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-uta-xmpp/
>>
>>
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> COMMENT:
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> This is important work. Thank you for doing it.
>>
>> I have a couple of points where I wasn't clear on the text, but they're
>> nits.
>>
>> I'm not quite sure what this text:
>>
>> 3.3.  Session Resumption
>>
>>     In XMPP, TLS session resumption can be used in concert with the XMPP
>>     Stream Management extension; see [XEP-0198] for further details.
>>
>> means in a major section called "Recommendations". Good idea? Bad idea?
>> Doesn't matter? It depends?
>>
>> I could read "can be used" as saying "it's physically possible", or "it's
>> OK", so I thought I should ask. I'm fine with you not saying anything
>> normative, but it seems like a thumbs up/down/sideways would be helpful,
>> at a minimum.
>>
>
> Yes, that section is a bit terse, isn't it?


:-)


> In general, the stream management extension (XEP-0198) is a Good Thing
> because it enables a client to know if its server did or did not handle the
> stanzas it has sent. In particular with regard to session resumption, if an
> XMPP session dies for some reason (e.g., spotty connectivity), XEP-0198
> enables the client to resume the XMPP session and resend any stanzas that
> were not successfully received over the original stream. Because these
> features have significantly improved the reliability of stanza delivery on
> the XMPP network, it's quite helpful for clients and servers to implement
> XEP-0198. In addition, XEP-0198 recommends the use of TLS session
> resumption to further speed this process, so the recommendation really goes
> in the direction of XEP-0198 to RFC 5077 and I don't know if it's
> appropriate for this document to say "you should implement XEP-0198".
>
> We might do something like this:
>
> OLD
>    In XMPP, TLS session resumption can be used in concert with the XMPP
>    Stream Management extension; see [XEP-0198] for further details.
>
> NEW
>    To improve the reliability of communications over XMPP, it is common
>    practice for clients and servers to implement the stream management
>    extension [XEP-0198].  Although that specification includes a method
>    for resumption of XMPP streams at the application layer, also using
>    session resumption at the TLS layer further optimizes the process of
>    session resumption.  See [XEP-0198] for detailed information.
>    Whether or not XEP-0198 is used for application-layer session
>    resumption, implementations MUST follow the recommendations provided
>    in [I-D.ietf-uta-tls-bcp] regarding TLS-layer session resumption.


That seems really helpful. Thank you for the untersification!

Spencer


>
>  In this text:
>>
>> 5.  Security Considerations
>>
>>     The use of TLS can help limit the information available for
>>     correlation to the network and transport layer headers as opposed to
>>     the application layer.
>>
>> I'm guessing what "as opposed to" means. Is this saying
>>
>>     The use of TLS can help limit the information available for
>>     correlation between the network and transport layer headers
>>     and the application layer.
>>
>
> Yes, that is clearer.
>
> Peter
>
> --
> Peter Saint-Andre
> https://andyet.com/
>
_______________________________________________
Uta mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta

Reply via email to