Hiya, It was pointed out to me that RFC4949 as a normative reference here is a downref, and I didn't call that out during the IETF LC for this document. (Sorry about that.) Oddly, 4949 hasn't previously been added to the downref registry. [1]
So, the choices are: 1. make 4949 an informative reference (possible I think but a teeny bit ickky) 2. I re-do the IETF LC just for this point and we put 4949 into [1] so this won't be a deal for other drafts in future Authors/chairs/WG: if you don't tell me you prefer #1 above, I'll assume #2 and re-start the IETF LC for this one tomorrow. For IESG folks: if it's ok, I suggest you continue your evaluations and we can handle this via me putting on a DISCUSS. If that's bad somehow, just tell me and we can defer the doc until the next telechat. Cheers, S. [1] https://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/iesg/trac/wiki/DownrefRegistry _______________________________________________ Uta mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta
