> This seems to me to be clearly "updating" or "profiling" RFC6125 normative > language, in the specific email use case.
Profiling it for email, yes. Why should that make it *update* the document that specifies the general process? Profiles need to normatively reference what they profile, but not the other way 'round. Barry _______________________________________________ Uta mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta
