>> This seems to me to be clearly "updating" or "profiling" RFC6125 >> normative language, in the specific email use case. > > Profiling it for email, yes. Why should that make it *update* the > document that specifies the general process? Profiles need to > normatively reference what they profile, but not the other way 'round.
OK, I can live with that. Thanks for the clarification, =JeffH _______________________________________________ Uta mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta
