Hi all We tried to constrain our edits here to only those topics discussed at the Argentina face-to-face, as Alex summarized in his overview. Hopefully these documents will look entirely familiar to anyone who reviewed draft-margolis-00
I vote for both to join the working group. Thanks for your help, everyone, /m --- Mark Risher | Google | 650-253-3123 On Apr 25, 2016 6:49 AM, "Leif Johansson" <[email protected]> wrote: > On 2016-04-25 15:37, Leif Johansson wrote: > > On 2016-04-25 15:29, Brotman, Alexander wrote: > >> Hello, > >> > >> We've incorporated much of the feedback we've received from the > community, and would like to present updated drafts. > >> > >> * One of the most evident changes is that we've split the draft into > two separate documents; one for the STS policy, and one for the TLS > reporting. These are meant to replace the original SMTP STS draft ( > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-margolis-smtp-sts-00). > >> * We've altered the name a bit from "SMTP STS" to "MTA STS" to be more > in line with DEEP, and have also added elements for the DEEP registry. > >> * After some deliberation amongst the authors, we've also decided to > remove the DNSSEC-related options for the STS policy, which should simplify > work for those wishing to deploy STS validation. > >> * Within the TLS reporting, we've explicitly mentioned several failure > modes, including those specifically relating to DANE and MTA STS. > >> * We've also altered the report syntax to use JSON instead of XML. > >> > > > > Thanks, > > > > In BA there was consensus (pretty strong at that) to adopt this draft as > > a WG document. > > > > s/this draft/these drafts/ > > This is 2 (two) separate consensus calls. Please express your support > or objection for either/both documents going forward as WG documents. > > > This starts an adoption call for adoption as a WG document. Please > > indicate your support or objection (with motivation) for WG adoption > > no later than EOB (any TZ) May 1st > > > > Cheers Leif > > > >> Please see drafts here: > >> > >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-brotman-mta-sts/ > >> > >> And > >> > >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-brotman-smtp-tlsrpt/ > >> > >> We'd like others to review and encourage further discussion relating to > these drafts. Thank you for your time. > >> > >> -- > >> Alex Brotman > >> Engineer, Anti-Abuse > >> Comcast > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Uta mailing list > >> [email protected] > >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta > >> > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Uta mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Uta mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta >
_______________________________________________ Uta mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta
