>This looks like a useful extension, analogous in some ways to the >reporting aspects of DMARC which I understand have been beneficial. I'm >not sure how reporting fits with the UTA WG's charter though: perhaps as >one of the 'best practices' that it alludes to? With that caveat, I >support adoption of TLSRPT as a WG document.
For DMARC, the reporting has been an essential step for large providers so they know what will happen before they turn any of policy knobs. I expect the same would be the case here. R's, John _______________________________________________ Uta mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta
