On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 6:40 PM, John R Levine <[email protected]> wrote:
> Random CNAMEs and SNI play poorly together. Might as well just use the > TXT record to point people at the real name of the server. > Heh. But in this case we don't really need HTTPS (or any validation), since the SMTP reports can be sent without validation (or so we have all said, I think). So same question for DMARC: if you had people using HTTP reporting, would you do the section 7.1 thing? I have no qualms about including it, given that it's already nicely spec'ed out, but this is sort of why we didn't bother at a first pass.
_______________________________________________ Uta mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta
