On 16/08/16 23:09, Jim Fenton wrote: > Name: draft-fenton-smtp-require-tls > Revision: 02
- Section 2, bullet point discussing the DNSSEC parameter: Should the requirement for dnssec to extend also to SRV, A and AAAA lookups? - Section 3.2, last paragraph (onward transmission must use REQUIRETLS): Should this have a "MUST" ? - Section 3.3, on introducing the need to REQUIRETLS to a message transmission chain: Currently the only actor described as having this authority is the sourcing MUA. What about a MAY permitting an MTA to either introduce or upgrade the requirement associated with a message? Probably best to also specifically "MUST NOT" any downgrade or removal, too. - Should a receiving MTA be required to mark up the Received: header it adds in some specific way for REQUIRETLS messages? -- Cheers, Jeremy
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Uta mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta
