> On Sep 19, 2016, at 7:40 PM, Jeremy Harris <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Irrelevant. DANE provides a means for the target MX to request
> encryption, REQUIRETLS provides a means for the sender to request
> encryption. Both are valuable.
You've lost context. I'm not saying that REQUIRETLS is unnecessary,
I am saying that the converse of REQUIRETLS is also necessary. That
is a user should be able to express:
* Security or bust, mandatory TLS all the way even of not
mandated by standing policy.
OR
* Delivery or bust, opportunistic TLS all the way, despite
any standing policy that requires (authenticated?) TLS.
--
Viktor.
_______________________________________________
Uta mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta
