On Tue, Dec 06, 2016 at 04:30:32PM -0800, Jim Fenton wrote:
> It has been a little while, so I thought it might be appropriate to give
> the WG an update on the status of REQUIRETLS
> (draft-fenton-smtp-require-tls-02).
Is there any new thinking on supporting user signalling of TLS
opt-out? (Urgent, but non-sensitive message needs to get through
despite DANE or STS policy that might otherwise hinder delivery
when some operational snafu breaks the promised security features).
I rather see opt-out as much more realistically useful than the
converse covered by REQUIRETLS. And I do still strongly believe
that the same spec should cover both halves of this problem.
--
Viktor.
_______________________________________________
Uta mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta
