On Fri, Dec 09, 2016 at 04:13:08PM -0000, John Levine wrote:
> >What would (for example) be the result if a client requested both
> >the REQUIRETLS and a separate MAYTLS feature?
>
> Given that mail servers will do whatever they wany with REQUIRETLS
> suggestions, I wouldn't obsess about this.
I'm trying, without much success it seems, to explain why REQUIRETLS is
an incomplete take on the requirements for per-message TLS policy, and
why fragmenting the solution over multiple specificaitons would be a bad
idea.
I am not too worried about what MTAs will or won't do with per-message
REQUIRETLS, just pointing out non-orthogonal features which hint at the
need for a single spec. I rather expect that the "require" side of the
per-message policy will see exceedingly little use.
--
Viktor.
_______________________________________________
Uta mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta
