> On Apr 5, 2017, at 11:00 AM, Jeremy Harris <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> The example in Appendix 9
All I see is "Section 10, Appendix 1" and "Section 11, Appendix 2".
What is "Appendix 9"?
> CNAME indirections should be explicitly discussed
> (I'd like them permitted).
Where would you like to see CNAMEs permitted?
[ Oh, and by the way, it seems the authors have concluded that
JSON policy has rough consensus. I am not sure that's accurate,
or at least don't think that accurately represents MTA implementors.
Where do you stand on the JSON issue? I am not looking forward to
adding a JSON parser to Postfix, or requiring all the O/S platforms
to provide a common C JSON API (is there one that is widely available)
as a pre-requisite for installing Postfix. ]
--
Viktor.
_______________________________________________
Uta mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta
