> On Apr 5, 2017, at 12:02 PM, Jeremy Harris <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On 05/04/17 16:46, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
>>
>>> On Apr 5, 2017, at 11:00 AM, Jeremy Harris <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>> The example in Appendix 9
>>
>> All I see is "Section 10, Appendix 1" and "Section 11, Appendix 2".
>> What is "Appendix 9"?
>
> Apologies. Section 9, being Appendix 2.
Oops, sorry, I though you were commenting on the STS draft, not
the report draft.
>> [ Oh, and by the way, it seems the authors have concluded that
>> JSON policy has rough consensus. I am not sure that's accurate,
>> or at least don't think that accurately represents MTA implementors.
>>
>> Where do you stand on the JSON issue? I am not looking forward to
>> adding a JSON parser to Postfix, or requiring all the O/S platforms
>> to provide a common C JSON API (is there one that is widely available)
>> as a pre-requisite for installing Postfix. ]
>
> I do not intend to add a JSON parser to Exim, and would make my
> anti-bloat views known to any of the other Exim developers.
>
> [I have the same views on any need for https, cf. MTA-STS]
Sorry that question was about STS...
--
Viktor.
_______________________________________________
Uta mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta
