Hi Mike,
On Mon, Sep 03, 2007 at 11:08:21AM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> looks to me like all of the locale handling should be localized to the
> include/nls.h file right ? and that a few things havent been converted to
> that ? it also looks like in the ENABLE_NLS path, no one really explicitly
> pulls in locale.h, yet in the !ENABLE_NLS path, locale.h gets pulled in !? in
> other words, util-linux wont build anymore on a real system that completely
> lacks locale/nls support ... this about right ? this patch should fix that
Deja vu :-) See:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.utilities.util-linux-ng/590/focus=592
I agree that we need a better support for compilation without
locales, but from my point of view NLS != all locales stuff. The NLS
support is subset only.
> Move all locale/nls related includes to nls.h and make sure they are only
> pulled in when ENABLE_NLS. When !ENABLE_NLS, don't include any locale/nls
> related headers and stub out setlocale() as well.
Maybe we can add --disable-locales and --disable-nls option will be
subset of --disable-locales.
BTW, is there any real life example for this change?
Karel
--
Karel Zak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe util-linux-ng" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
