-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Tuesday 16 March 2004 02:55 pm, Steve Meyers wrote: > Today, it completely conked and didn't come back up until my wife > rebooted it. This is not making me very trusting of the ActionTec > router. Has anyone else experienced similar problems? In the past when > I had DSL, I used the Cisco 675/678. Are those better at handling high > traffic?
While I cant' say much on this subject, there is currently an ongoing discussion on the sllug list about it, vs the Cisco series. You have to be a list member to read the archives it appears, but everyone can use another LUG list right? http://www.sllug.org - -- - -- Jayce^ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFAV3n6A10/0O8cAHgRAgj3AJ48LLAGoOqeMhin7VyuP8Zg7qL5GACeMXAN X3V+Sr7K6j+PNS+rml7nyiQ= =G0RK -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ____________________ BYU Unix Users Group http://uug.byu.edu/ ___________________________________________________________________ List Info: http://uug.byu.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/uug-list
