I've got a Cisco 675, No cables. If you're interested, let me know. -----Original Message----- From: Gabriel Gunderson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2004 3:17 PM To: BYU Unix Users Group Subject: Re: [uug] ActionTec DSL router
> On Tuesday 16 March 2004 02:55 pm, Steve Meyers wrote: > > Today, it completely conked and didn't come back up until my wife > > rebooted it. This is not making me very trusting of the ActionTec > > router. Has anyone else experienced similar problems? In the past when > > I had DSL, I used the Cisco 675/678. Are those better at handling high > > traffic? Well, I don't know what's better but I know what I like. The Cisco is more for me. I'm STILL looking for anyone who wants to sell me a Cisco 678. No cables or cords needed. PLEASE let me know if you have one... dial-up is wrecking my marriage (O.K. that's a lie). My service gets powered-up tomorrow and I'm without a modem. Heck, I might even buy a used ActionTec if it came down to it :( Thanks, Gabriel ____________________ BYU Unix Users Group http://uug.byu.edu/ ___________________________________________________________________ List Info: http://uug.byu.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/uug-list ____________________ BYU Unix Users Group http://uug.byu.edu/ ___________________________________________________________________ List Info: http://uug.byu.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/uug-list
