Apparently you didn't see the wink.... ;-)
> -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:uug-list- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Alberto Treviño > Sent: Monday, July 28, 2008 10:32 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [uug] PKI, Public Keys, secrets, and obscurity > > On Monday 28 July 2008 10:09:21 pm Stuart Jansen wrote: > > I doubt that a security design with 100 levels of abstraction and > > interaction can be implemented correctly. When it comes to security, > the > > most simple design is the most likely to be the most secure. ;-) > > I meant 100-level course as in a Security 100 or Security 101 class, > not > implementing security at 100 levels. > > -- > Alberto Treviño > BYU Testing Center > Brigham Young University > > -------------------- > BYU Unix Users Group > http://uug.byu.edu/ > > The opinions expressed in this message are the responsibility of their > author. They are not endorsed by BYU, the BYU CS Department or BYU- > UUG. > ___________________________________________________________________ > List Info: http://uug.byu.edu/mailman/listinfo/uug-list -------------------- BYU Unix Users Group http://uug.byu.edu/ The opinions expressed in this message are the responsibility of their author. They are not endorsed by BYU, the BYU CS Department or BYU-UUG. ___________________________________________________________________ List Info: http://uug.byu.edu/mailman/listinfo/uug-list
