Stuart Jansen wrote: > On Mon, 2008-07-28 at 22:31 -0600, Alberto Treviño wrote: >> On Monday 28 July 2008 10:09:21 pm Stuart Jansen wrote: >>> I doubt that a security design with 100 levels of abstraction and >>> interaction can be implemented correctly. When it comes to security, >>> the most simple design is the most likely to be the most secure. ;-) >> >> I meant 100-level course as in a Security 100 or Security 101 class, >> not implementing security at 100 levels. > > I realize that security is a difficult topic. But I should think we > could manage to teach it in a handful of courses. Requiring IT > professionals to take 100 courses is unrealistic. I mean have you > even considered the incredible time burden you're suggesting? Let's > say that the average student is capable of taking 5 courses per > semester. That means 20 semesters. Mix is a few spring and summer > terms and we're still talking at least 7 years of education.
And that'll just be for a Minor in Security! > The mind boggles. Surely you jest. Security isn't a game. Brian Phillips -------------------- BYU Unix Users Group http://uug.byu.edu/ The opinions expressed in this message are the responsibility of their author. They are not endorsed by BYU, the BYU CS Department or BYU-UUG. ___________________________________________________________________ List Info: http://uug.byu.edu/mailman/listinfo/uug-list
