On 31 July 2013 15:46, David Korn <[email protected]> wrote: > cc: [email protected] > Subject: Re: Re: [uwin-users] [uwin-developers] Realtime signals > (RTMIN-RTMAX) in UWIN? > -------- > >> Does this preclude the implementation of sigqueue() and SIGRTMIN/SIGRTMAX? >> AFAIK the only hard thing I could imagine is that you'd have to sort >> the list of incoming realtime signals because higher signals should >> always be processed by the process than lower-numbered realtime >> signals. >> >> Ced >> -- >> Cedric Blancher <[email protected]> >> Institute Pasteur >> > > This does not preclude the implementation of sigqueue(). > > However, my understanding is that real-time signals are processed from > lowest to highest. > > It says in section 3.3.1.2 > 'When multiple unblocked signals, all in the rante of SIGRTMIN to SIGRTMAX > are pending, the behavior shall be as if the implementation delivers the > pending unblocked signal with the lowest signal number within that range."
So the problem is to sort the queue? Ced -- Cedric Blancher <[email protected]> Institute Pasteur _______________________________________________ uwin-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.research.att.com/mailman/listinfo/uwin-users
