On 17.03.2011 13:34, Roberto De Ioris wrote: >> On 17.03.2011 12:58, Roberto De Ioris wrote: >>>> On 17.03.2011 12:50, Leonid Borisenko wrote: >>>>> I've noticed 'embedded' build option (that sets UWSGI_EMBEDDED >>>>> define) >>>>> and curious about it's purpose. >>>>> [...skip...] >> Well, for now this name of option makes sense for me, as 'embedded' >> means 'embed module for accessing to uWSGI API into language bridge >> plugin', but not 'building with some embedded plugins is requested by >> user', as I initially thought, looking at option name. >> >> Honestly, plain 'embedded' doesn't give any clues for it's real >> purpose and coexistence of 'embedded' and 'embedded_plugins' is >> confusing. Could you consider changing of 'embedded' name? >> 'api_access_module' or 'provide_api_module' or something similar will be >> more clear. >> > > Oh yes, this is not a problem, i think 'expose_api' could be a good name.
Yes, 'expose_api' is good. Thanks! _______________________________________________ uWSGI mailing list [email protected] http://lists.unbit.it/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/uwsgi
