Il giorno 19/ago/2011, alle ore 15:58, Michael Tharp ha scritto: > On 08/19/2011 12:42 AM, Roberto De Ioris wrote: >> >>> little correction: >>> in the [head] revision it already trying to check major version, but >>> code is still wrong. >> >> Yes, there are kernels guidelines, and it looks like arch is not following >> them :( >> >> The kernel version should be composed of threee parts, so 3.0.0 instead of >> 3.0 > > The version scheme changed with the 3.0 release. Regular releases are now > 3.0, 3.1, etc. and stable releases are e.g. 3.0.1. Unsurprisingly, this broke > a few things. > > Source: https://lwn.net/Articles/452531/ >
I am sure i read a post some days ago, where the 3 scheme was re-introduced. By the way, it is no more a problem, i have fixed this morning the build support for 2 digit uname(), currently it is only needed on arch as the other distro i tested already use the 3.0.0 form. I think we should be safe until 4 (instead of 4.0) :) -- Roberto De Ioris http://unbit.it JID: [email protected] _______________________________________________ uWSGI mailing list [email protected] http://lists.unbit.it/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/uwsgi
