2007/8/1, Klaus D. Witzel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Ron, the invariant I wrote does not care about the return value. If > Damien's change keeps that behavior (indeed I'm convinced that Damien will > do so) then chances are that nobody really used the mistaken return value. > The users of #back in 3.9/10 and 3.8 do discard the value, AFAICT.
If you have a look at String>>asSignedInteger and PositionableStream>>backChunk, you have a use of the returned value of #back. > I agree with you, remove #oldBack. Whoever would change his code to use > make use of #oldBack, can equally well put in the correct use. If anyone wants to fix #asSignedInteger and #backChunk, we can remove #oldBack. -- Damien Cassou _______________________________________________ V3dot10 mailing list [email protected] http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/v3dot10
