I am handing off the final decision of whether we want to land this change
or
not off to Andreas, since he is leading the ES6 effort. To me the
cost-benefit
ratio of this change is unclear due to lack of a concrete (non-micro)
benchmark.
I personally am not a huge fan of the amount of micro-optimization that is
going
on (i.e. manual loop unrolling) and would rather keep it simple, but I can
see
the benefits of having a O(log n) implementation instead of O(n).
<sarcasm>Of
course there is a O(1) solution by just introducing a RepString instance
type.</sarcasm>
Andreas: WDYT?
https://codereview.chromium.org/401783003/
--
--
v8-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://groups.google.com/group/v8-dev
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "v8-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
