On 2014/10/08 14:01:12, mathias wrote:
Re: U+180E, it seems a bit strange to use Unicode v7.0.0 for one part but
Unicode v5.1.0 for other parts of the engine. Just to be clear, the ES
spec
allows using a more recent version than v5.1.0:
https://people.mozilla.org/~jorendorff/es6-draft.html#sec-conformance I
wonder
if it'd be less confusing to pick one or the other rather than kind-of
going
with both at the same time.
Addressed comments.
Regarding U+180E, I'm relying on ES6 draft section 11.2
"ECMAScript implementations must recognize as Whitespace code points listed
in
the "Separator, space" (Zs) category by Unicode 5.1."
There seems not much wriggle room here. It does not state "Unicode 5.1 or
later"
here.
https://codereview.chromium.org/638643002/
--
--
v8-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://groups.google.com/group/v8-dev
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "v8-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
