On 2014/12/03 19:22:53, caitp wrote:
On 2014/12/03 19:20:29, arv wrote:
> LGTM
>
> We have to keep our eyes on the next spec draft since there are some
changes
> coming here.
Well it's behind an unstaged flag still, so there's a bit of time :D
Would a
small standard lib feature like this also need the full blown launch
process
with thread and everything?
For individual functions that would be overkill. But I think we'll want to
lump
shipping all the new array functionality together, and in that case it will
probably justify an accumulative intent-to-ship. But there is still stuff
missing.
https://codereview.chromium.org/363833006/
--
--
v8-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://groups.google.com/group/v8-dev
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "v8-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
