On 2014/12/04 11:36:00, rossberg wrote:
On 2014/12/03 19:22:53, caitp wrote:
> On 2014/12/03 19:20:29, arv wrote:
> > LGTM
> >
> > We have to keep our eyes on the next spec draft since there are some
changes
> > coming here.
>
> Well it's behind an unstaged flag still, so there's a bit of time :D
Would a
> small standard lib feature like this also need the full blown launch
process
> with thread and everything?
For individual functions that would be overkill. But I think we'll want to
lump
shipping all the new array functionality together, and in that case it
will
probably justify an accumulative intent-to-ship. But there is still stuff
missing.
Okay --- it would be good to have one more green light before landing it I
think, at least.
https://codereview.chromium.org/363833006/
--
--
v8-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://groups.google.com/group/v8-dev
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "v8-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
