On 2015/02/19 18:50:04, Michael Starzinger wrote:
On 2015/02/19 18:31:19, Benedikt Meurer wrote:
> General direction is good.
>
> One question that bugs me: Why don't we embed the handler table into the
code
> object?
Thanks for the quick review, will address the detailed comments tomorrow.
To
answer your question: No particular reason, the table is external for
full-codegen already so I just decided to go with an external table for
TurboFan
as well without giving it much thought. I don't see a reason we couldn't
embed
it into the code object. Maybe as a follow-up once everything is working?
WDYT?
Sounds good, thanks.
https://codereview.chromium.org/943503003/
--
--
v8-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://groups.google.com/group/v8-dev
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "v8-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
