I'm not sure the debugger stuff can wait, I wouldn't want to ship a thing
that
showed an extra phantom variable in devtools.
Andreas, any thoughts on me adding some sort of new VariableMode that's
lexical
but internal?
https://codereview.chromium.org/1218543003/diff/40001/test/mjsunit/harmony/destructuring.js
File test/mjsunit/harmony/destructuring.js (right):
https://codereview.chromium.org/1218543003/diff/40001/test/mjsunit/harmony/destructuring.js#newcode735
test/mjsunit/harmony/destructuring.js:735: assertThrows("'use strict';
let x = {}; for (let [y, x] of {x});", ReferenceError);
On 2015/06/29 14:48:43, arv wrote:
What is the motivation for repeating the test?
To ensure that we're giving all the bound names TDZs, not just the first
one.
https://codereview.chromium.org/1218543003/
--
--
v8-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://groups.google.com/group/v8-dev
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "v8-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
