https://codereview.chromium.org/1230793002/diff/140001/src/objects.cc
File src/objects.cc (right):
https://codereview.chromium.org/1230793002/diff/140001/src/objects.cc#newcode662
src/objects.cc:662: access_check_failed = false;
This alternative implementation doesn't change the nature of [[Get]] in
general, but provides an alternative way of getting properties when
special behaviour is required in the case of access checks.
This duplicates some code, and the method name isn't very good. But I
think this is more general and applies to other well-known Symbols (eg
if something special is done for @@toStringTag instead of treating it as
undefined --- not spec'd yet but it sounds like it's a possibility?).
What are peoples thoughts?
https://codereview.chromium.org/1230793002/
--
--
v8-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://groups.google.com/group/v8-dev
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "v8-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
